Here are 5 laptops with Nvidia Geforce MX250 graphics that you can buy in 2020, listed from lowest to highest price. These computers will help you game well and edit videos without breaking the bank.
The “mx350 laptop” is a computer that has the Nvidia Geforce MX250 Graphics. This laptop is one of the best laptops to buy in 2020.
Nvidia’s Geforce MX 250 graphics processor
The Nvidia Geforce MX 250 is a laptop graphics processor that has made it into the Nvidia Geforce MX 250 days, but still performs well in the application and small 3D areas. The 3D performance is enough to play less demanding 3D games at FullHD quality in a pleasing manner. Performance-hungry titles, such as Rage 2 or Anno 1800, on the other hand, seldom operate smoothly and need a more powerful hardware.
With OpenCL or CUDA programs, which may also accelerate image processing filters, conversion, or encryption activities with the graphics processor, the user should anticipate a decent working performance. This assures increased application performance while simultaneously reducing the processor’s burden.
In terms of functionality, Nvidia’s graphics solution includes everything you need: Multi-monitor operation, 4K resolution, video acceleration, and conversions are all part of the broad toolkit, which should cover a wide range of potential applications.
HP Spectre x360 comes in first.
HP Spectre x360 Laptop (HP Spectre x360 Laptop)
- High-speed operation
- Also appropriate for gaming
- Touch screen with pinpoint accuracy
- Type C USB 3.1 port with Thunderbolt
- Life of the battery
- When fully loaded, it is quite loud.
A lovelessly fashioned folding computer in a black plastic garment may likewise be fobbed off to those who seek a notebook that is as inexpensive as possible. Manufacturers that wish to fulfill high standards, on the other hand, must excel not only in terms of performance, but also in terms of noble design. Will HP’s Spectre X360 15 equipment edition with Kaby-Lake-G CPU and Windows 10 succeed, as tested here?
This isn’t your typical instance.
The HP has a stylish brown aluminum shell with golden metal borders around the display and base unit. If you enjoy this color scheme, you’ll like the enhanced torsional rigidity of the laptop. Unfortunately, the display cannot be folded up with only one hand; you must hold on to the base unit or the display will fight upwards.
Video Review of the HP Spectre x360
The touchscreen of the HP Spectre x360 15 is good, however it is unstable.
The screen may even be folded around 360 degrees into the keyboard’s back. As a result, the Spectre X360 is suitable for both laptop and tablet usage. This isn’t a given in this class; after all, the tested model is a full-fledged 15-inch laptop, although most so-called convertibles are only available in 13-inch sizes. With a weight of precisely 4.8 lbs., the Spectre is not a light tablet; extended usage as a tablet requires strong arms or a storage platform. After all, the touchscreen accurately and quickly translates fingertip input. Those who use the touchscreen in laptop mode, on the other hand, want for stronger hinges: even a little touch causes the display to jiggle like pudding.
4K monitor with sharp, true-color images
The visual quality, on the other hand, merits nothing but praise: the screen displays movies, games, and photographs in 4K with a great deal of clarity. As a result, even the tiniest blooms do not sink into the colorful dirt and can be identified individually. Regardless of the topic, the Spectre displays images and videos in true-to-life colors. At 12.4 milliseconds, the picture transition is so quick that no unattractive streaks may detract from fast-paced movie sequences.
HP Spectre x360 15 with AMD and Intel drives
However, a brilliant display does not ensure a fantastic laptop, since it still need a strong disk. HP chose the Kaby-Lake-G processor, which was jointly developed by AMD and Intel, over a conventional CPU for the Spectre. The Spectre is the third device to use this CPU, after the Intel NUC8i7HVK Hades Canyon Mini PC and the Dell XPS 15 9575 Notebook. The CPU has 16 GB of RAM, while the graphics chip, the Nvidia Geforce MX250, has 4 GB of graphics memory. The operating system, applications, and data are all stored on a fast Samsung m.2 SSD with 477 GB of memory and a PCI Express connection.
Really quick, but thirsty
The HP Spectre’s fast speed was tested in the lab, and thanks to its strong graphics chip, it’s even sufficient for playing current games. However, the player must drop the resolution from 38402160 (4K) to 19201080 (Full HD) or 1366768 pixels since the noise level rises noticeably. Frames will only jerk across the screen in slow motion if this is not done. Unfortunately, the display and CPU relentlessly drain the battery, so one charge is only enough for four hours of work without a power outlet – adequate but not exceptional.
The main areas of criticism are the short battery life and the excessive noise level when the device is fully loaded. Overall, the HP Spectre X360 is a fantastic laptop with a fantastic display and fast performance thanks to the strong MX250 graphics processor.
Second, there’s the Dell Vostro 15.
The Dell Vostro 15 Laptop is a 15-inch laptop by Dell.
- System performance is excellent.
- With 512GByte, it’s a decently fast SSD.
- Design is stunning.
- Several connections
Long battery life and good daily performance
The laptop may impress in terms of computational capability thanks to the Intel Core i7-10510U CPU. Thanks to the 16 GByte RAM and the speedy SSD, the system is always active enough. Thanks to energy-saving components, the 42 watt hour battery lasts a long time. Over seven hours of movie playback is excellent – and even if the compute demand is a little larger, 5 hours is still reasonable.
Video Review of the Dell Vostro 15
The casing quality and connection are equally impressive. There are enough USB ports (although none of them are USB Type-C), VGA and HDMI outputs, as well as a full-featured SD card reader, as well as ac-WLAN and Gigabit Ethernet (wired LAN). In addition to the number pad, a fingerprint sensor is incorporated as a bonus.
Unfortunately, Dell’s display is just moderate to terrible. While the Full-HD (1,920 x 1,080 pixels) resolution is acceptable, the rest of the tested data is not. The display is dim (223 cd/m2), and the checkerboard contrast (the simultaneous display of dark and bright sections) is poor (132:1). The display is unstable from a viewing angle, which means that when seen from the side, one can anticipate a decrease of display quality, and the sRGB color space coverage of 66 percent only allows for a pale color display.
The touchpad is delightfully rough, which allows the finger to move over it without sticking, although the keyboard takes some getting used to. Some people are put off by the short stroke length and the low counterpressure.
The Dell Vostro 15 laptop does not place first in our test, but it does win the price-performance ratio award with a score of 9.6. In terms of battery life, system performance, and case construction, it performed well in our lab tests. After our test, we had to critique the performance in the display category.
Acer Aspire 5 is the third option.
The Acer Aspire 5 is a laptop from Acer.
- DX-11 games and fast in the office
- Effortless operation
- Image quality is excellent.
- Colors that are somewhat pale
- SSD with a small footprint
What’s new at Whiskey Lake these days? Apart from a boost in performance, Intel also adds a USB 3.1 controller to the CPU series. This enables for a potential transmission rate of 10 gigabits per second. This implies that huge films from an external hard drive, for example, may be transferred twice as quickly to the internal hard drive – potentially. In actuality, the Aspire 5’s internal hard drive interface slows things down: the SATA connection is the bottleneck, and only an SSD with a PCI Express connection would be able to keep up with the faster USB speeds.
That isn’t a tragedy, but it is unfortunate since the CPU is really fast: The Core i5-8265U features four cores and a 1.6 GHz clock speed. For energy-sapping operations, the CPU turns on a lot more power and boosts the clock rate to up to 3.9 gigahertz in turbo mode. However, when the fans are running at full speed, they become quite noisy. The laptop doesn’t remain cold even when there’s a strong breeze: After two hours of usage, the bottom of the Aspire was 32 degrees hotter.
Video Review of the Acer Aspire 5
Whiskey at work on the Acer Aspire 5
Office and video editing software function without a hitch. When you’re playing, the Acer begins to stagger. Although the Nvidia Geforce MX250 graphics unit in the chip isn’t enough for today’s top games, the laptop can still run outdated Direct-X-11 games at 37 frames per second when the resolution is reduced – this isn’t a given. The DDR-4 memory is very great and speedy, but with just 8 gigabytes, it’s pretty little. Photos, films, and music may all be stored on a traditional hard drive with 932 GB of RAM.
The Acer Aspire 5 has a color-blind display.
Even if colors seemed a little pale on the 15.6 inch screen, the Full HD display (1920 1080 pixels) proved convincing in the visual test. When seen from the side, the brightness drops dramatically. Even fast-paced action sequences in movies ran without streaks thanks to the reaction speed of 4.6 milliseconds, which is excellent for an office laptop.
Acer Aspire 5 setup is simple.
The tools are standard: There are two USB 2.0 ports in addition to two USB 3.1 sockets (one type C). A memory card reader, as well as a camera and microphone for video telephony, are included. The Aspire 5 supports the current WLAN-ac standard, as well as Bluetooth (for usage with headphones, for example). Good: The battery has a four-hour and 19-minute run time.
The Acer Aspire 5 in the A515-52-58S9 configuration reviewed here, which has the brand-new Whiskey Lake CPU, is well-made, light, and quick. The Aspire has a lot of steam under the hood, so office users shouldn’t have anything to complain about. Only the Core i5-8265U CPU does not regularly utilise its full capabilities.
The Asus ZenBook 14 comes in fourth place.
The Asus ZenBook 14 is a laptop by Asus.
- The screen borders are chic and exceedingly tiny.
- A virtual number pad may be shown on a touchpad.
- Exceptional keyboard
- Operation is quite silent and lasts a long time.
- SD card reader is quite sluggish.
- Upgrade choices are limited.
Review of the Asus ZenBook Pro 14
The tremendous mobility was extremely appealing in practice. On paper, the Zenbook Pro 14’s size and weight don’t seem too exciting, but given the technology within, it’s still a compact and unobtrusive laptop.
In terms of performance, you should anticipate a good showing from our test equipment, and you’ll receive it delivered. With the power cord attached, we were able to get 1590 points in the 3DMark Time Spy and 658 points in the Cinebench R15 CPU test. In battery mode, the scores are somewhat lower, with 1542 points in Time Spy and 456 points in Cinebench R15. In both occasions, the CPU reached a temperature of 100 degrees, which is quite hot. In the meanwhile, the Nvidia Geforce MX250 graphics card stayed rather cool in the 70-degree range.
Video Review of the Asus ZenBook Pro 14
According to the manufacturer, the data carrier is the NVME-SSD Western Digital PC SN520, which has a data rate of 1700 MB/s for reading and 1400 MB/s for writing. This corresponds to the values obtained by CrystalDiskMark.
In ordinary chores like browsing and utilizing office applications, the Zenbook showed no flaws. When it comes to more demanding applications, like as gaming, the MX250’s performance limitations become apparent. We were able to play games with modest demands, such as Overwatch or Apex Legends, at FullHD quality at roughly 60 FPS with medium details. However, even if the card is fully endowed with 4GB GDDR5 RAM in terms of memory, it may become important while playing top current games in maximum detail. The raw GPU performance is just unable to compete with that of full-fledged gaming laptops in this case. It’s also worth noting that the system’s full gaming potential is only realized when the power supply is connected. The performance is throttled as usual in battery mode to save energy and save the battery.
With the Zenbook Pro 14, Asus has created a great all-rounder in the premium sector, with a modest accent on performance rather than mobility. This is notably noticeable in the weight, which is somewhat heavier at 3.3 lbs. than ultra-portable ultrabooks, which typically weigh 2.0–2.4 lbs. In exchange, the customer receives an eighth-generation i7 processor with sufficient fast RAM and, most important, a Geforce Mx250 4GB graphics card that is also suited for gaming and can smoothly show most current games – at least when powered by the adapter. In light of this, the 14-inch FullHD display is a good choice, however a 4K option would have been nice for professionals.
In terms of design, there’s nothing to complain about since the craftsmanship and aesthetics are excellent, and the ingenious raising of the gadget when it’s opened is also a well-thought-out feature. Only the departure of Thunderbolt 3 would be a letdown here, but it’s a pain to take. As previously said, views on the ScreenPad are diverse, but Asus’ effort in execution is unquestionably commendable. In light of these considerations, we suggest the Zenbook Pro 14 to our readers.
The Asus ZenBook 13 comes in fifth place.
The Asus ZenBook 13 is a laptop by Asus.
- Bluetooth 4.2, WLAN-ac
- The keyboard is well-lit.
- Long-lasting battery (6:33 hours)
- Exceptionally light
- There are no upgrading options available.
- Under full load, it’s a little noisy.
You’ll like models like the ZenBook 13: If you don’t simply want to place a notebook on your desk, but also use it on the go, you’ll appreciate it. The Windows-10 Ultrabook is merely 2.8 pounds and comes in a stealthy outfit on top of that. The Asus ZenBook 13 test determines if the tiny lightweight has sufficient power and endurance.
The Asus ZenBook 13 is the perfect size, neither too huge nor too little.
The ZenBook is a good size that is neither too huge nor too little. With the convenient 13-inch Ultrabook, you can work quite well. It’s in a well-made casing with no creaks or squeaks when pressed hard. And this isn’t by any means a given. After all, instead of noble metal, Asus chose light plastic as the casing material. The only way the Taiwanese could get the weight below 3 lbs. was to do this. Because the Asus isn’t a notebook-tablet hybrid with a rotating display and complicated hinge, it’s surprisingly slim: With a height of about 0.8 inches, it fits into even the tiniest of pockets.
Video Review of the Asus ZenBook 13
Demonstrate a minor flaw.
Documents and web sites are shown in Full HD (1920 x 1080 pixels) on the screen. The 2,073,600 pixels on a 13-inch display with a 13.5-inch screen diagonal are more than enough for a crisp display. However, the Asus does not place a high value on color representation: Color fidelity was 80.9 percent in the test. This is unquestionably superior; the cool reproduction only causes problems in ordinary life when editing images, not while using office or internet apps. Good: The display is anti-glare, so reflections aren’t an issue.
Steam engine of a small size
A consumer who is expected to spend money on the Asus ZenBook 13 in the “UX331UAL (90NB0HT3-M01170)” equipment model, which is evaluated here, expects high-performance hardware. And you are aware of this. The top-of-the-line Intel Core i7-10510U from Intel’s Kaby-Lake refresh series pushes the envelope, and the RAM is amply sized at 16 gigabytes. The operating system, applications, and data are all stored on a 512GB M.2 SSD with fast NVMe memory, rather than a slow hard drive. In this price range, this high-quality gear is now a need. Because it is only with it that an Ultrabook can function rapidly, even when it needs to compile numerous clips into a film or do another energy-intensive task. It has the required power for gaming and editing thanks to the Nvidia Geforce MX250 graphics chipset.
Under full load, there’s a lot of puff and it’s a little noisy.
However, the CPU sweats during more demanding jobs, necessitating the use of a modest fan to remove the heat from the chassis. In calm environments, the fan noise is perceptible, but the Asus ZenBook remains cool and runs nearly quietly for internet and office duties. The battery life is also impressive: in our tests, the lights only went out after six and a half hours of work and video processing, following which the Asus needed to be plugged in for roughly two and a half hours to charge fully.
The Zenbook 13 performed well in our tests, with the exception of the color accuracy of the display, which may be enhanced. Aside from that, it impressed with its small size, light weight, fast speed, and extended battery life.
Nvidia Geforce MX250 Graphics Card Information
The Nvidia Geforce MX 250 is an entry-level mobile graphics solution for entry-level laptops. It’s the successor of the Nvidia Geforce MX 150, and it’s best for games that don’t need a lot of resolution or detail.
The Nvidia Geforce MX 250 is built on Nvidia’s Pascal architecture and seems to be almost identical to the Nvidia Geforce MX 150 at first appearance. Because the GP108 chip is still made in a 14-nm process, there should be no changes in energy usage or heat generation.
The MX250 chipset is a mid-range processor.
Nonetheless, there are some significant improvements for the user in the capabilities now available. In the latest iteration, HDMI 2.0b, DisplayPort 1.4, and HDR are available, allowing for more options in the intended application areas.
Models of the Nvidia Geforce MX 250
The GPU-Z (techpowerup) database offers two separate performance variants of the Nvidia Geforce MX 250, as it did with the Nvidia Geforce MX 150. The 10 watt version (GP108B) is ideal for ultra-compact laptops, while the 30 watt version (GP108) is likely to be preferable for more powerful models. In this case, the memory clock and core clock speeds diverge significantly.
Furthermore, certain laptops are clearly equipped with an Nvidia-Geforce-MX-250 model with 4 GB GDDR5 graphic RAM. The data sheets for the HP Pavilion 14-ce2010ng and HP Envy 17 ce0002ng, for example, show this divergent variation.
Nvidia Geforce MX 250: Technical Data Excerpt 30 Watt TDP GP108
- Manufacturing method with a 14-nm resolution
- Shader units: 384
- 24 TMUs/16 ROPs
- Turbo Boost from 1,519 MHz to 1,582 MHz core clock
- GDDR5 graphics memory: 2 GB/GDDR5 graphics memory: 4 GB
- Memory clock: 1.752 MHz
- The memory bus is 64 bits wide.
- DX 12.1
- OpenGL 4.6 is the latest version of the software. is the latest version of the software.
- OpenCL 1.2 is the latest version of OpenCL. is the latest version of OpenCL.
- DirectCompute 5.0 is a new version of DirectCompute. is a new version of DirectCompute.
- Optimus by Nvidia
- Nvidia Gameworks is a division of Nvidia. is a division of Nvidia.
- GPU Boost 3.0 by Nvidia
- 30 Watt TDP
Nvidia Geforce MX 250: Technical Data Extraction 10 Watt TDP GP108B
- Manufacturing method with a 14-nm resolution
- Shader units: 384
- 24 TMUs/16 ROPs
- Turbo Boost from 937 MHz to 1,038 MHz core clock
- GDDR5 graphics memory of 2 GB
- Memory clock of 1.502 MHz
- The memory bus is 64 bits wide.
- DX 12.1
- OpenGL 4.6
- OpenCL 1.2
- DirectCompute 5.0
- Optimus by Nvidia
- Nvidia Gameworks
- GPU Boost 3.0 by Nvidia
- 10 Watt TDP
- Specifications for Nvidia products
Nvidia Geforce MX 250: Extraction of the test system’s technical data
- T490 Lenovo ThinkPad
- IPS monitor with WQHD resolution
- Intel Core i7-8565U processor
- RAM: 16 GB DDR4 (Dual Channel)
- Nvidia Geforce MX 250 graphics card with 2 GB GDDR5 memory
- SSD (512 GB)
- 64-bit Windows 10 Pro
- 417.37 Nvidia
Benchmarks for the Nvidia Geforce MX 250
The Nvidia-Geforce-MX-250 graphics card proves to be a good answer in our tests. In 3DMark Cloud Gate, it achieves a good 12.876 points, while in 3DMark Time Spy, it can get 1.274 points. You may anticipate more than double the 3D performance compared to the Intel UHD Graphics 620. For modern 3D games like Rage 2 or Anno 1800, this isn’t adequate, but older games like Dirt Rally or Tomb Raider work nicely on the screen with lower resolution and restricted quality settings.
There are no significant improvements in the bottom line when compared to the previously tested Nvidia Geforce MX 150. In terms of pure performance, the Nvidia Geforce MX 250 is essentially the same as the Nvidia Geforce MX 150 from the Acer Aspire 5 A515, and so represents little more than a rebranded Nvidia Geforce MX 150.
The Nvidia Geforce MX 250, like the Nvidia Geforce MX 150, performs well in OpenGL applications. The attained result of 105 frames per second in Cinebench R15 OpenGL shading is just one frame per second slower than the Nvidia Quadro P4000.
OpenGL is a graphics programming interface (optimized, workstation CAD)
The Nvidia Geforce MX 250, unlike the Nvidia Quadro M520, does not have specific drivers for professional applications. As with the Nvidia Geforce MX 150, performance in OpenGL-optimized programs should be disappointing. When using CAD applications with DirectX interfaces, such as 3dsMax or Showcase, the OpenGL limitation is removed, and the processing power should match to the real computer capability. Check out the Nvidia Geforce MX 150’s test results.
Graphics processors may be utilized for a wide range of computationally demanding jobs through the OpenCL interface, in addition to normal graphics workloads. Conversions, image processing filters, video filters, encrypting and decrypting data, and financial analysis computations are among them. On the one hand, using the graphics chip for such activities relaxes the CPU, but on the other hand, it delivers a significant performance gain.
Financial analysis, encryption, image processing, scientific computations, and raytracing were all areas where the Nvidia Geforce MX 150 was put to the test. The Nvidia Geforce MX 250 should be able to use the results.
The graphics performance in the laptop area is always dependent on the cooling system that has been placed in the notebook. Manufacturers also like to limit graphics and/or CPU performance under full load scenarios to stay within specified thermal limits from time to time. In the case of the Nvidia Geforce MX 250, there are two variants with differing performance levels in circulation, which reveal some significant performance variances. It is frequently only discovered after buying which version is utilized in particular notebook.
The Nvidia Geforce MX 250 in the Lenovo ThinkPad T490 is aided by an efficient Intel Core i7-8565U CPU and a well-dimensioned cooling system. Furthermore, the more powerful form with a GP108 processor is utilised in this application. The graphics unit in the test operates at a constant clock rate of 1.518 MHz, which periodically climbs to 1.582 MHz. Other laptop ideas with different alignment and hardware devices may have variances.
The “nvidia geforce mx250 price” is the best laptop with Nvidia Geforce MX250 graphics. The laptops listed are all budget laptops with high performance, and they are also some of the cheapest laptops on the market.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is MX250 good for gaming?
A: The MX250 is a good laptop for gaming. It has the power to do your typical PC game well, but dont expect it to be able to run every game on high settings at 1080p.
Is Nvidia GeForce MX250 good for engineering?
A: Nvidia GeForce MX250 is not a good choice for engineering.
What is the best laptop graphics card 2020?
A: A graphics card is a component inside a computer system designed to handle the rendering of 2D images and 3D scenes for games, video, or other visual media. Graphics cards are often referred to as video cards, though they also have other functions such as providing support for virtualization technology or acting as an output device for TV signal processing devices.
- mx250 vs gtx 1050
- laptop mx250 termurah
- nvidia geforce mx250 vs integrated graphics
- nvidia geforce mx250 for graphic design
- acer aspire 5 a515-54g